Citation principle: Entries follow the APA author-date principle. «n.d.» denotes a date not substantiated for the source used. Short titles, pages and section headings in the text lead to the passages actually consulted. Edition titles are retained. A bibliographically identified work is not regarded as having been read in full. The evidence register distinguishes directly examined passages, abstracts, metadata and previously documented project source assessments. Indirect evidence is identified as such. Entries are combined alphabetically; explanatory distinctions between sources follow the list.
Abebe, M. A., & Tangpong, C. (Eds.). (2025). Research handbook on turnaround strategies. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/research-handbook-on-turnaround-strategies-9781035315895.html
Argyris, C. (1977, September). Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1977/09/double-loop-learning-in-organizations
Bartunek, J. M. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 355-372. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393029
Bartunek, J. M., & Franzak, F. J. (1988). The effects of organizational restructuring on frames of reference and cooperation. Journal of Management, 14(4), 579-592. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400408
Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: A cognitive approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638702300404
Bartunek, J. M., & Ringuest, J. L. (1989). Enacting new perspectives through work activities during organizational transformation. Journal of Management Studies, 26(6), 541-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1989.tb00744.x
Berg, I. K. (n.d.). Solution-building procedures [Handout, PDF p. 1]. Brief Family Therapy Center; archived by the Solution Focused Brief Therapy Association. https://www.sfbta.org/Solution-building_procedures.pdf
Burke, W. W., & Litwin, G. H. (1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18(3), 523-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800306
Center for Self-Determination Theory. (n.d.). Theory. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/theory/
Cicero, M. T. (1933). De natura deorum (Book II, Section 72) [English text reproduction of the Loeb edition]. LacusCurtius, University of Chicago. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cicero/de_Natura_Deorum/2A*.html
Covey, S. R. (2023). Die 7 Wege zur Effektivität für starke Familien (I. Pross-Gill, Trans.; 9th, abridged and revised ed.). GABAL. (Original work published 1997). https://www.gabal-verlag.de/media/fs/2/9783967391497_Leseprobe.pdf
Creasey, T. (2026, August 7). Definition of change management. Prosci. https://www.prosci.com/blog/definition-of-change-management
de Shazer, S. (n.d.). Goals & solutions: A useful distinction [Short text, four PDF pages]. Brief Family Therapy Center; archived by the Solution Focused Brief Therapy Association. https://www.sfbta.org/goals-solutions.pdf.pdf
Die Bibel: Lutherbibel, revidiert 2017. (2017). Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft. https://www.die-bibel.de/bibel/LU17/MRK.1
Dudenredaktion. (n.d.-a). Compliance. In Duden online. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Compliance
Dudenredaktion. (n.d.-b). Governance. In Duden online. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Governance
Dudenredaktion. (n.d.-c). intrinsisch. In Duden online. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/intrinsisch
Dudenredaktion. (n.d.-d). Organisation. In Duden online. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Organisation
Dudenredaktion. (n.d.-e). radikal. In Duden online. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/radikal
Dudenredaktion. (n.d.-f). Religion. In Duden online. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Religion
Dudenredaktion. (n.d.-g). Resilienz. In Duden online. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Resilienz
Dudenredaktion. (n.d.-h). Sünde. In Duden online. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Suende
Dudenredaktion. (n.d.-i). Telos. In Duden online. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Telos
Duke University Press. (n.d.). Modern social imaginaries [Publisher description and metadata]. https://www.dukeupress.edu/modern-social-imaginaries
FranklinCovey. (n.d.-a). The 7 habits of highly effective families [Official description of the work]. https://www.franklincovey.com/books/the-7-habits-of-highly-effective-families/
FranklinCovey. (n.d.-b). The 7 habits of highly effective people [Official presentation]. https://www.franklincovey.com/courses/the-7-habits/
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022-1054. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071862
Hornung, E. (2014). Immigration and the diffusion of technology: The Huguenot diaspora in Prussia. American Economic Review, 104(1), 84-122. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.1.84
Hosang, A. (2023). Firma Christentum im Bankrott: Wie funktionstüchtig ist das Christentum heute noch? hoffnung HEUTE, (7), 38-51. [Author's copy supplied; source identity according to the project analysis.]
Hosang Consulting. (n.d.). Go-to-Market-Steuerungsmodell: Phasen, Rollen und Übergänge. https://hosang-consulting.com/go-to-market-steuerungsmodell
International Organization for Standardization. (2021a). ISO 37000:2021: Governance of organizations: Guidance [Official freely accessible description of the standard; no full-text access]. https://www.iso.org/standard/65036.html
International Organization for Standardization. (2021b). ISO 37301:2021: Compliance management systems: Requirements with guidance for use [Official freely accessible description of the standard; no full-text access]. https://www.iso.org/standard/75080.html
Kanton Bern, Bildungs- und Kulturdirektion. (n.d.). Kultur der Täufer (Mennoniten). https://www.lt.bkd.be.ch/de/start/traditionen/kultur-der-taeufer.html
Lactantius. (1886). The divine institutes, Book IV, Chapter 28 (W. Fletcher, Trans.). In A. Roberts, J. Donaldson & A. C. Coxe (Eds.), Ante-Nicene fathers (Vol. 7). Christian Literature Publishing. Text reproduction at New Advent. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/07014.htm
Laloux, F. (2016). Reinventing organizations: An illustrated invitation to join the conversation on next-stage organizations (E. Appert, Illustrations). Nelson Parker.
Leverage Experts. (n.d.). Situations of rapid change. https://leverage-experts.com/situations-of-rapid-change/
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., & Jones, H. S. (n.d.). Μετάνοια. In A Greek-English lexicon [Digital edition, Scaife ATLAS]. https://atlas.perseus.tufts.edu/dictionaries/entry/urn%3Acite2%3Ascaife-viewer%3Adictionaries.v1%3Alsj-n66831/
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
Ministero della Cultura. (2021, February 10). Museo Scuola Beckwith di Angrogna [Site description, update]. https://cultura.gov.it/luogo/museo-scuola-beckwith-di-angrogna
Mounce, W. D. (n.d.-a). ἁμαρτάνω. In Greek dictionary. https://www.billmounce.com/greek-dictionary/hamartano
Mounce, W. D. (n.d.-b). ἁμαρτία. In Greek dictionary. https://www.billmounce.com/greek-dictionary/hamartia
Mounce, W. D. (n.d.-c). μετάνοια. In Greek dictionary. https://www.billmounce.com/greek-dictionary/metanoia
Newhouse, D. R., & Chapman, I. D. (1996). Organizational transformation: A case study of two Aboriginal organizations. Human Relations, 49(7), 995-1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900706
Nystrom, P. C., & Starbuck, W. H. (1984). To avoid organizational crises, unlearn. Organizational Dynamics, 12(4), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(84)90011-1
Penguin Random House. (n.d.). The fifth discipline by Peter M. Senge [Publisher record for the revised 2006 edition]. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/163984/the-fifth-discipline-by-peter-m-senge/
Rafferty, K. (2021). A framework of severity and uncertainty of the status of a firm. Academia Letters, Article 4239. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL4239
Rafferty, K. A. (n.d.). Failing managerial systems under the impression of volatile organizational transformation: Exploring the managerial twilight zone [Unpublished, undated manuscript, 59 pages]. No claim of publisher or peer-review endorsement is made.
Schein, E. H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2), 3-16. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/coming-to-a-new-awareness-of-organizational-culture/
Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. A. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.
Senge, P. M. (n.d.). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization [Undated scan of an extract from a revised edition; printed pages 13-14 examined]. Currency Doubleday. https://www.seeing-everything-in-a-new-way.com/uploads/2/8/5/1/28516163/peter-senge-the-fifth-discipline.pdf
Shea, C. M., Jacobs, S. R., Esserman, D. A., Bruce, K., & Weiner, B. J. (2014). Organizational readiness for implementing change: A psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implementation Science, 9, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-7
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385806
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. (n.d.). Moravian Church Settlements. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1468
Versammlung Ehrbarer Kaufleute zu Hamburg. (n.d.). Leitbild. https://www.veek-hamburg.de/leitbild
Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4, Article 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
White, E. G. (1885). Testimonies for the church (Vol. 3) [Digital version of the collected edition; passages 3T 497.3-498.1 compared here with the reprint in Gospel Workers]. Ellen G. White Estate. https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/119.2320
White, E. G. (1892). Steps to Christ [Digital version, chapter «The Test of Discipleship»]. Ellen G. White Estate. https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/108.217
White, E. G. (1903). Education [Digital version, chapter «Source and Aim of True Education»]. Ellen G. White Estate. https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/29.29
White, E. G. (1915). Gospel workers [Digital version, section «Decision and Promptness»]. Ellen G. White Estate. https://text.egwwritings.org/read/35.663
White, E. G. (1985). Christian leadership [Posthumous compilation]. Ellen G. White Estate. https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/12.267
William Bridges Associates. (n.d.). Bridges transition model. https://wmbridges.com/about/what-is-transition/
Zille, T. (2020). A change of mind: The reception of Treadwell Walden’s The great meaning of metanoia (1896). History of Humanities, 5(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1086/707717
Notes on source identity and use
The sources are kept separate. The undated 59-page SRC draft is the supplied file and the basis of the present critique of the draft. The article published in 2021 is directly accessible under DOI 10.20935/AL4239. The publisher’s table of contents for the 2025 handbook, edited by Michael A. Abebe and Chanchai Tangpong, lists Rafferty’s chapter «Corporate transformation and resource constraints as moderators of corporate distress in a unified framework of severity and uncertainty» starting on p. 155 (Abebe & Tangpong, 2025, publisher’s table of contents). The full chapter text was not analysed; the next contribution starting on p. 180 does not replace independently verified evidence of the final page. The additionally listed title A long way down and a situation of rapid change (2020) remains without complete independent identification. None of these works is equated with the draft. New bibliographical details do not retrospectively confirm its tables or theses.
The additional Bible passages read, Ex 20,1-17, Mt 22,34-40 and 1 Tim 1,5, refer to the already listed Lutherbibel 2017. The description of Covey’s work and the book sample are separate sources. For the flight metaphor, the documented book page 11 of the 2023 edition is used; no claim is made to a complete reading of the book or identical pagination in earlier editions.
The other glossary terms are explicitly working definitions and condensations of the sections already supported by evidence. The etymology of a term is not proof of the effects of the approach it names.
Appendix D. People and contributions to which this work refers
Naming a person refers exclusively to the specified contribution. It neither endorses their entire work nor adopts their political, religious or personal positions. The register contains associations with works, not new biographical claims. The depth of review is set out in the evidence register. People who were merely earmarked in earlier collections of ideas but whose contributions were not used are not retrospectively turned into sources here.
Chris Argyris: Directly examined theoretical reference to learning loops and Model II; location and section locators are given in Q01.
Michael A. Abebe and Chanchai Tangpong: Editors of the 2025 handbook. Consulted here solely to establish the bibliographical context of Rafferty’s contribution, not as authors read in support of a separate claim about effects (Q14).
Jean M. Bartunek: Changes in shared interpretations, organisational structures and investigated practice; different publications with different depths of review (Q02, Q16-Q18).
Michael K. Moch: Co-author of the cognitive approach to three orders of change (Q02).
Frank J. Franzak: Co-author of the investigation into reorganisation, frames of reference and cooperation (Q17).
Jeffrey L. Ringuest: Co-author of the investigation into the embodiment of new perspectives in work activities (Q18).
W. Warner Burke and George H. Litwin: Jointly authored model of organisational performance and change; hypothetical relationships, used here on the basis of the abstract (Q03).
Royston Greenwood and C. R. Hinings: Research reference on radical organisational change; in-depth examination of the original remains outstanding (Q04).
Paul C. Nystrom and William H. Starbuck: Reference to the connection between unlearning and organisational crises; limitations of version and access must be observed (Q05).
Edgar H. Schein and Peter A. Schein: The fifth edition of Organizational Culture and Leadership is attributed to both; earlier individual contributions by Edgar Schein remain separate (Q06).
Charles Taylor: Historical and philosophical reference to shared social imaginaries. The application to companies is our analogy (Q07).
Marylène Gagné and Edward L. Deci: Joint contribution on self-determination and work motivation; internalisation and intrinsic motivation must be distinguished (Q08).
Bryan J. Weiner: Theory of organisational readiness; also co-author of the ORIC investigation (Q09-Q10).
Christopher M. Shea, Sara R. Jacobs, Denise A. Esserman and Kerry Bruce: Other authors of the ORIC study. The evidence is the joint publication with Weiner, not an overall individual position invented from co-authorship (Q10).
Lynne Herscovitch and John P. Meyer: Three forms of commitment to a specific change, explicitly accessed here through Weiner (Q11).
Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham: Directly examined passages on goal setting and task motivation; no replication of the studies was carried out for this work (Q12).
Tim Creasey: Author of the named Prosci definition; a provider’s perspective rather than independent evidence of effects (Q13).
Kolja A. Rafferty: Author of the supplied SRC draft and of the separately read 2021 contribution. The 2025 handbook chapter is bibliographically identified. Different works and review statuses are not conflated (Q14).
David R. Newhouse and Ian D. Chapman: Authors of the comparison of two Indigenous organisations, now checked directly against the publisher’s abstract. Detailed methodology and transferability remain limited (Q19).
Erik Hornung: Author of the historical productivity study. It does not investigate an isolated effect of religious conversion (Q20).
Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott and Henry Stuart Jones: Names of the lexicographical reference used; this does not equate ancient word usage with Christian interpretation (Q22).
Tom Zille and Treadwell Walden: Zille is the author of the reception study; Walden is the historical author examined in it. Walden’s work is not an additional newly read primary source (Q23).
Peter M. Senge: Directly read management reception of metanoia; printed pages known, the specific edition of the scan still unresolved (Q24).
William Bridges: Reference author of the transition approach presented by William Bridges Associates; no mandatory sequence of phases or guarantee of success is deduced (Q25).
Ellen G. White: Author of the religious and normative texts used. Original writings and posthumous compilations are distinguished; no empirical validation of management is deduced from them (Q27-Q29).
Historical actors and institutions: Charles Beckwith appears as a historical actor in the context of the Waldensian school, not as a theorist. UNESCO, cultural authorities and the Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft are institutional sources or publishers. Biblical figures are not presented as authors of modern studies.
Frédéric Laloux: Supplied illustrated edition of 2016; relationship between underlying orientation, practice and self-correction. No independently verified success rate for his cases (Q32).
Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg: Original materials on the distinction between goal and solution, exceptions and small steps. Limited application to conducting conversations, not validation of a business method (Q33-Q34).
Stephen R. Covey: Family perspective based on FranklinCovey’s official description of the work and the documented textual evidence for the flight metaphor in the GABAL sample of the 2023 edition, p. 11. Analysis remains limited to the specified passages (Q35).
William D. Mounce: Lexicon reference for the distinction concerning hamartia used here. Not a business goal model (Q38).
Andreas Hosang and VEEK: Hosang’s earlier publication and public Go-to-Market steering model document references informing his thinking (Q31, Q37). The guiding principles of the Versammlung Ehrbarer Kaufleute zu Hamburg are a contemporary normative source from an association (Q36).